Geological
studies estimate earth to be around 4.5 billion years old. Anthropological
studies reveal that the anatomical evolution of human beings was completed some
50,000 years ago. Since then, man, in his quest to know about the universe in
which he is placed, has been working towards and praying for: “What in me is
dark, / illumine, what is low, raise and support”.
Right from Galileo Galilei to Issac
Newton, Albert Einstein, Max Planck, Werner Heisenberg to today’s Steven
Weinberg, A Salam, S Glashow, Gell-Mann, Neeman, Stephen Hawking, it is the
quest to ‘comprehend the apparently incomprehensible’—the underlying reality
behind the universe—that has eluded and is eluding the greatest scientists of
the day.
Intriguingly, as early as in the 19th century, the end of this enigma appeared to
have come closer to man when Albert Michelson said: “Future discoveries (in
Physics) must be looked for in the sixth place of decimals.” But that is not
what it turned out to be: Einstein came out theorizing that space and time are
inextricably interrelated and that mass and energy are two sides of the same
coin. Then we had Max Planck coming out with a theory that rocked the world of
Physics: light and other forms of energy exist as discrete particles, ‘quanta’.
Disturbed by what Werner Heisenberg from Copenhagen, Paul Dirac from Cambridge,
and Erwin Schrödinger from Zurich said under their quantum mechanics, Einstein
expressed his anguish in his famous dictum: “God does not play dice.”
Thus emerged the intellectual
battle in explaining ‘quantum’ between the group of physicists led by Einstein
on one side and the other led by an equally brilliant Niels Bohr. Over the
years, experimental physicists—John F Clauser, Staurt Freedman, Alain Aspect,
Jean Dalibard, Gerard Roge—have however tended to tilt towards Bohr’s
proposition. Nevertheless, there are many physicists who continue to believe
that particles are real even at the sub-atomic level and that the theory of
quantum mechanics is incomplete.
Later research by
particle physicists led to the realization that while the electron is a truly
fundamental particle, neutrons and protons are made up of smaller particles
known as quarks, which are, of course, considered as truly elementary. This
lead to the formulation of the ‘Standard Model’—a model that attempts to explain
the fundamental building blocks of the universe and the forces through which
these blocks interact.
According to the
Standard model, there are twelve basic building blocks: six of these are
quarks, named up, down, charm, strange, bottom, and top; the remaining six are leptons
that consists of electron and its two heavier siblings—the muon and the tauon,
plus three neutrinos. There are also six 6 antiquarks and six antileptons. All
the known particles are thus the composites of quarks and leptons.
There are four
fundamental forces in the universe: gravitational, electromagnetism, weak and
strong nuclear forces. However, Standard model explains only the strong, weak,
and electromagnetic fundamental interactions using mediating gauge bosons. The gauge
bosons are: eight gluons that carry strong force; W–, W+, and Z bosons that
transmit weak force, and the photons that mediate electromagnetic forces.
Finally, the Standard model predicts the existence
of a type of boson (for, it has a certain value of a quantum-mechanical
property known as spin), named Higgs boson (named after a British physicist,
one of its leading developers), but not a gauge boson. According to Higgs
theory, particles live in a field, called Higgs field, with which they
interact. And these interactions result in attraction of Higgs bosons to the
particles whereby they gain mass. Thus, Higgs boson has two functions: one, to give
mass to particles, and two, to enable the Standard model to function as defined.
Identification of Higgs boson, the hypothesized
elementary particle, is thus highly critical for the very validation of the Standard
model. In other words, unless Higgs is identified, all that what physicists
claim to know today about the universe would be wrong. It is to identify Higgs
presence, physicists working at CERN
in Geneva crashed bunches of protons coming in opposite directions at enormously
high energies by accelerating them to move at near the speed of light in the CERN’s
Large Hadron Collider (LHC). When protons collide, their energy is converted
into other particles. Massive magnetic systems in the form of ATLAS—A Toroidal
LHC Appratus— and CMS—Compact Muon Solenoid is specially looking for the Higgs
boson— that are placed on opposite sides of the LHC’s loop, are supposed to facilitate
bending of the paths of the charged particles so that they can be measured. It
is with the help of these instruments that the patterns of observable particles
that Higgs is theoretically supposed to break into are identified.
Based on the findings of the study
carried out, physicists working at CERN announced on 4th July, that
they had found Higgs boson. It is indeed a crowning achievement for the
physicists, though it is not the end of the story, for it asks new questions:
Does the particle identified by them match with the prescribed properties of
Higgs? If not, what it means to the Standard model? How about the matter-antimatter
asymmetry?
And of course, that is what Science
is all about—a constant search for truth!
Images Courtesy: guardian.co.uk,
csmonitor.com
No comments:
Post a Comment