Inflation has
once again become the headline news. And
the alarm it has raised this time round is understandable; for within a short
span it has peaked to a 44-month high of 7.83% against an
acceptable/comfortable level of 5%. The
worst part of the current inflation is the rise in the price indices of all
categories—primary articles, manufactured goods and fuel—in both year-on-year
and week-on-week terms.
Given that,
there are experts who consider our Wholesale Price Index (WPI) itself is simply
wrong, and they have a point. In their view, WPI is meaningless, for it
measures only the prices of goods, while today services account for 55% of our
GDP. Secondly, it does not talk about prices at the consumer level, and by the time
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is released, the data becomes obsolete. And here
again, they suspect CPI’s ability to truly represent the price situation at the
lower strata of the society, incidentally for whom inflation matters the most.
Hence, they strongly believe that inflation anywhere above 5.5% is in itself a
threatening phenomenon for those in low-brackets of income.
As if it is the
right time, rupee too has started falling at this very hour of rising inflation
and depreciated by 6% since April 15, making the fiscal measures—such as
cutting import duties on edible oils and maize, banning export of pulses and
non-basmati rice, withdrawal of export incentives for steel and cement, and
other questionable measures including banning futures trading in certain
agricultural commodities, threatening to add steel to the list of its
‘essential commodities’, etc.—initiated by the government less effective in
arresting prices. Looking at the all round surge in prices, the emerging global
food crisis, the rising oil-prices and falling rupee, one is more tempted to
infer that prices will not come down in the immediate future; and no wonder, if
on the other hand, inflation peaks to 8% soon. Cumulatively, all these
developments have made the job of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) more daunting.
Striking a right balance between price control and growth is always a big
challenge, particularly for a central bank of a developing country, since there
is always a cost behind controlling inflation.
No matter whether one follows Keynesians or monetarists, as inflation is
generally controlled by pursuing contractionary policies, it results in reduced
output, employment and income.
It is against
this backdrop that the RBI, as a policy response, has raised Cash Reserve Ratio
(CRR) by another 25 basis points to 8.25%—the third increase in the last three
weeks to contain liquidity. Contrary to
the general expectation, the RBI has, of course, more sensibly retained its
benchmark interest rate at 7.75%. This balancing act of the RBI— maintaining
the growth momentum and inflationary expectations by opting for CRR hike
alone—might have surprised many,
particularly those monetarists who strongly believe in what Milton Friedman
said: “Inflation is always a monetary phenomenon.” What Friedman meant here is
that when the price for wheat rises, a consumer would spend more on acquiring
wheat, and his ability to spend on other items such as, say, TV or fridge
becomes less, and hence their prices fall. He therefore concludes that money determines
the overall price level of an economy, but not of any one good. Therefore,
monetarists proclaim that in the long run, inflation is a monetary phenomenon
and inflation arises when the money supply expands more rapidly than output.
They indeed consider the quantity of money as an ‘exogenous’ variable, by which
they mean that money growth is an independent causal variable defining the rate
of inflation. In other words, inflation, according to monetarists, flows from
money in the form of excesses demand—excess of aggregate demand over aggregate
supply—that raises prices, but not the other way round.
But looking at
the Indian experiences —outbreak of major droughts often resulting in
skyrocketing prices of food items leading to hunger and malnutrition in the
rural areas—one wonders if inflation is always a monetary phenomenon.
Friedman’s statement—for a given quantum of money supply, a rise in the price
of an item, say, for instance rice, is offset by a fall in the price of another
good, say, television—may be an apt reflection of price behavior in rich
economies such as the US, but is less likely to hold good for India since food
items alone constitute roughly 80% of the budget of almost 60% of the
population. Secondly, our WPI allocates lesser weight to food items, as today
agriculture hardly accounts for 20% of GDP. In the light of these ground
realities, we cannot presume that inflation is always a monetary
phenomenon.
Against the
backdrop of the demand-supply mismatches across the domestic and global
markets, the RBI’s decision not to raise interest rates sounds pretty rational
and sound. In such a situation, mere monetary tightening will be of little use
in controlling the inflation. The solution for the current rise in prices
therefore lies not in short-term monetary policy, but obviously elsewhere:
long-term efforts are essential to mitigate the supply-side constraints under
food-grains. It must make long-term investments for improving agricultural
productivity, energy-efficiency and transport infrastructure in the country.
Economics,
however, says that today’s increased prices must induce greater production
tomorrow. But in capital-starved developing economies, such adjustments are
sure to take a long time to happen on their own, and that is where governmental
intervention is warranted to ensure growth—the right answer for our
inflationary woes.
(June, 2008)
No comments:
Post a Comment