The
financial architecture of the world has been undergoing drastic changes for the
last two decades. The collapse of the communist economic systems has only speeded up
the transition of countries from a regulated economy to market economy. Several
developing countries have been struggling to restructure their fragile banking
system. It is firmly believed for the last 200 years that weakness in the
banking sector may have wider effects as the problems in one bank could spill
over into more widespread difficulties in the sector. The very nature of
contracts, such as, short-term deposits and longer-term loans that banks hold,
exposes them to the possibility of runs. Banks being the backbone of the
payment system of a country, their failure will spell higher costs to the
economy. From a macro point of view, the efficiency, of the banking system
impacts the intermediation costs while from a micro-perspective, efficiency is
critical to the very survival of banks in the competitive world. Poorly functioning
banking systems impede economic progress and can even destabilize economies
while well functioning banks are known to accelerate economic growth. In view
of this, there is a need for constant assessment of banks’ effectiveness,
particularly, the banking systems of transitional economies. But the existing
literature on efficiency levels in banking system is mostly confined to OECD
countries.
The paper “Banking Efficiency in Transition Economies: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Banks”, written by Stefania P S Rossi, Markus Schwaiger, and Gerhard Winkler, investigates cost efficiency and its determinants in the Central and Eastern European countries, namely, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia, over the period 1995-2002. The paper also examines if there are any significant variations in efficiency among the banking systems that emerged during the transition period. The authors have produced a well fitting cost function through a stochastic frontier analysis using a Fourier flexible form, and controlling for country effects. The study reveals that banks have more discretion in handling capital expenses, compared to labor expenses. It is also found that ‘producing’ loans is more cost intensive than ‘producing’ deposits. The efficiency estimates arrived at, through the stochastic frontier approach, exhibit a generally low level of cost efficiency in CEE countries. There are also large variations in the cost function and efficiency estimates across countries. The study identifies the decreasing size, increasing non-interest business, lower problem loans, and bank typology as the determinants of efficiency levels in the CEE markets.
The paper “Banking Efficiency in Transition Economies: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Banks”, written by Stefania P S Rossi, Markus Schwaiger, and Gerhard Winkler, investigates cost efficiency and its determinants in the Central and Eastern European countries, namely, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia, over the period 1995-2002. The paper also examines if there are any significant variations in efficiency among the banking systems that emerged during the transition period. The authors have produced a well fitting cost function through a stochastic frontier analysis using a Fourier flexible form, and controlling for country effects. The study reveals that banks have more discretion in handling capital expenses, compared to labor expenses. It is also found that ‘producing’ loans is more cost intensive than ‘producing’ deposits. The efficiency estimates arrived at, through the stochastic frontier approach, exhibit a generally low level of cost efficiency in CEE countries. There are also large variations in the cost function and efficiency estimates across countries. The study identifies the decreasing size, increasing non-interest business, lower problem loans, and bank typology as the determinants of efficiency levels in the CEE markets.
It is commonly perceived that private ownership of firms results
in better intrafirm allocation of resources, leading to existence of more
efficient firms. Researchers have also been arguing that managers of privately
owned firms can be induced to perform efficiently by way of ‘takeover threats’,
while a public sector manager is, quite often, found to be immune to such
disciplining. There is also enough empirical evidence coming from China, East
European countries, etc., fortifying this belief. Ironically, there is also
enough empirical evidence to the effect that private firms may not always take
decisions that are consistently in congruence with the motto of ‘profit
maximization’. For instance, literature on mergers and acquisitions reveals
that no additional performance of the predator and target firms was noticed after
the merger, as these decisions were said to be mostly based on factors that
maximize the payoffs of the managers. So, one section of economists argues that
privatization is not the sole panacea for efficient performance. Emboldened by
these realities, these economists strongly argue that state-owned businesses
can as well be made efficient by increasing competition and hardening budget
constraints. These observations are found to be equally applicable to financial
intermediaries like banks. However, a few studies that analyzed the relative performance
of state-owned and private-owned banks do not indicate a strong relationship
between ownership and performance. The article, “Are Foreign Banks Active in
Emerging Credit Markets? Evidence from the Indian Banking Industry”, undertakes
a systematic study of the lending behavior of foreign banks in India, in
relation to domestic banks, by making use of the data for the years 1995-96 to
2000-2001 and stochastic frontier analysis. The authors have estimated an efficient
frontier with regard to their ability to disburse credit, and also calculated
the distance between each bank and the efficient frontier. The study has shown
that there is a steady improvement in the technical efficiency of domestic
banks with respective credit disbursals and, over a period, have even surpassed
the efficiency levels of foreign banks. The authors also points out that the
domestic de novo banks outperform the others, both in profitability and
technical efficiency, in credit disbursal. The impact of liberalization of the
banking industry and the resultant competition are also palpable. The authors
finally conclude that competition, rather than foreign ownership per se,
is more likely to be the panacea for the banking sector in developing
countries.
The article, “GARCH Effect and Asymmetric Impact of
Information on Exchange Rate Volatility”, estimates the GARCH model for a set
of exchange rate series of three major currencies, viz., the US Dollar, UK
Pound and Japanese Yen, against the Indian Rupee by taking daily data from
1993-2003. The study revealed a significant ARCH and GARCH effect in the three
exchange rates studied. The empirical evidence shows that the change in
volatility, with the arrival of news—good or bad, is significantly asymmetric
for all the three currencies. Among the three currencies studied, volatility
under Dollar and Yen is found to be more sensitive to bad news than to the
good.
The behavior of the overnight market for unsecured loans is
critical to monitory authorities, since this market hosts the first step in the
monetary transmission mechanism. However, much of the literature that studied
this mechanism assumes that the central banks have a direct control on
short-term interest rate. Against this backdrop, the paper, “Interest Rate
Determination in the Interbank Market”, constructed a theoretical model of the
money market to analyze how this control is actually exerted. The authors have
also studied the linkages between the statistical problems of equilibrium in
the overnight market and the operational framework of monetary policy. They
have used the EONIA panel database that includes daily information on the
lending rates applied by contributing commercial banks. The study reveals an
increase in both the time series volatility and the cross section dispersion of
rates, towards the end of the reserve maintenance period. Similar patterns were
noticed both in volumes traded and the usage of the two standing facilities
provided by the central banks. The theoretical model has also shown that the
operational frame work of the monetary policy causes a reduction in the
elasticity of supply of funds by banks, throughout the reserve maintenance
period. The elasticity is high, declines gradually over time and becomes low on
the last day of the period. Market segmentation and heterogeneity are also
found to generate the distribution of rates and trade across banks.
IJBM Vol 3 No. 4
No comments:
Post a Comment