Britain, the nation that once colonized countries from
different continents by ardently adopting the philosophy of ‘divide and rule’
has finally, ignoring the sane advice, “Divided we fall”, of that venerable
newspaper, The Economist, voted itself out of its nearly six decades of
relationship with European Union giving not only a wild jolt to the very
existence of the EU but also sending its own economy into a tailspin.
And intriguingly, no one appears to be quite aware of how the
politicians would handle the difficult negotiations relating to the real exit
of Britain from the EU except that as the European Council President, Donald
Tusk said, “there is no way of predicting all the political consequences of
this event, especially for the UK.”
The decision of Britain to leave the EU has in the meanwhile
sent global markets into a free fall: Pound Sterling spiralled to its lowest
levels in three decades witnessing an intraday swing of more than 10% between
its high and low points against the dollar; the FTSE 100 was down by 8.7% on
opening but steeled at 4.3%, while, of course, bank stocks suffered the worst
beating with Lloyds down by 21%, Royal Bank of Scotland by 18%; the Euro Stoxx
bank index by 17%; US equities slumped by more than 2%, while its currency
posted one of its biggest rallies— simply put,
trillions of dollars have been wiped off the global stock exchanges.
Over it, major credit rating agencies have downgraded
Britain’s credit ratings. Importantly, it is feared that thousands of jobs in
the financial sector, for which London has grown over the years as the hub of
the financial network in Europe, are likely to evaporate, once the financial
service firms realize that they can no longer carry out business activities
from London in another EU country without attracting additional costs that
usually go with the tag of ‘foreign entity’. Which means: London is all set to
lose its role as the trading center for euro-denominated assets. Similarly,
once London could no longer claim to be a gateway to Europe, it will
automatically forego its preferred destination tag for foreign investors. So,
where from money will come for UK to manage its current account deficit?
That aside, Britain, has to now negotiate with the EU
authorities for tariffs to be imposed on their goods and services to be
exported to EU member countries. And it is pretty certain that EU will grant no
favor whatsoever to UK, for it will desire to send a strong signal to the
remaining member countries that leaving EU will cost them dearly. Which is why, it is feared that UK’s exports
to the continent market will shrink adding further woes to its economy that has
already been affected by the depreciating Pound, which if continues to stay
low, is certain to raise the cost of imported goods. This fall in Pound could
also result in a jump in inflation, of course, in the short run, but is sure to
burden the less-privileged of the society more. With all this, businesses that
have set up their shops in UK with a view to serving the EU market are sure to
reconsider their position. What if, they relocate! What if the fear of younger
voters of the Brexit turn true? Will it not affect the older voters?
Now, moving on to the more important aspect of Brexit’s
impact on global economy and the international political system, it must be
admitted that nothing is yet certain. For, no one knows how Brexit settlement
that entails re-imposition of tariffs and restrictions on immigration from EU
countries to Great Britain will impact the EU setup. What if the EU, in
response to Britain’s impositions and goaded by its absence in EU, moves
towards protectionism?
Interestingly, we should remember here one important
consequence of such protectionism resorted to by EU: it will be watched with
greater attention by the largest Asian economies, particularly, China and
Japan, since their manufacturing industries seek easy access to EU markets for
their own survival. Will this also lead to protectionism being exhibited
elsewhere? Trump, the Republican candidate for the US Presidency, is already
advocating protectionism. The world has barely recovered from the financial
crisis of 2008 and if protectionism resurfaces everywhere, the global economy
is sure to end up yet in another recession.
That
aside, Britain’s withdrawal from the EU has another dimension: security
concerns. Russia is watching from the side-lines as to how it might gain from
the weakening of the EU, for it believes that EU without Britain to be less
close to the US. And, for America, Britain’s exit from EU is a real setback for
neither Germany nor France did share its basic ideology as much as Britain is.
And this shall reflect in the functioning of NATO. To that extent, it heralds
western weakness.
Cumulatively, all these elements of politico-economic
instability interacting with each other in the days to come in ways that are
not known today, will make predicting the future that much difficult.
Nevertheless one thing appears obvious: it is all a potential harbinger of a
broader backlash against globalization!
No comments:
Post a Comment