Bob
Dylan, the 75-year-old singer-songwriter of “extraordinary poetic power”, who
made the world at large know of his artistic independence by a simpler but
honest expression, “I am just a song and dance man” has won the 2016 Nobel
Prize in literature for “having created new poetic expressions within the great
American song tradition.”
Although Dylan, the “poet laureate of
rock ‘n’ roll” has been on the fringes of Nobel Prize discussions for more than
a decade, few experts from the literary world expected the academy to bestow
the honor to a gener such as popular music. And this stunning announcement of
the Academy has piqued some writers. Purists expressed shock, indeed felt
offended with the Academy considering lyrics like “You don’t need a weatherman
to know which way the wind blows”; “I was so much older then, I’m younger than
that now”; “Lay, woman lay” as poetry and honoring Dylan with a place alongside
of William Faulkner, Steinbeck, Ernest Hemingway, Toni Morrison and the like.
In the colorful words of Irvine Welsh, it as “an ill-conceived nostalgia award
wrenched from the rancid prostates of senile, gibbering hippies.”
On the other hand, writers like Salman
Rushdie, Joyce Carol Oates and Toni Morrison have welcomed the award.
Interestingly, joining Sara Danius, the permanent secretary of the Swedish
Academy, who said, “If you look far back, 2,500 years or so, you discover Homer
and Sappho. They wrote poetic texts that were meant to be listened to and performed,
often together with instruments, and it’s the same way for Bob Dylan,” Salman
Rushdie, describing Dylan “the brilliant inheritor of the bardic tradition”,
praised the Academy’s selection as “Great choice.”
Controversies aside, for long, scholars
have been debating if Dylan’s lyrics can stand on their own as poetry and
produced astonishing volume of research work praising his music: The Oxford
Book of American Poetry included his song “Desolation Row,” in its 2006
edition, and Cambridge University Press released “The Cambridge Companion to
Bob Dylan” in 2009, which confirms his reputation as a brilliant literary
stylist. American historian, literary critic and novelist, Ron Rosenbaum says
that Dylan managed to “mine and undermine language, speech and emotion,
crystallize feelings in a way that remains still mysterious and magical…I think
he’s had a kind of subtle effect on language, on the deadpan, put-on, sarcastic
way we talk.”
Gordon Ball, an English professor at
Washington and Lee University proposed Dylan as a Nobel candidate as early as
in 1996 citing “the almost unlimited dimensions of Dylan’s work, how it has
permeated the globe and affected history.” Randall Fuller felt of Dylan’s work
that hoovered around the “questions of human freedom” with, of course, a clear
appreciation “about its limitations”—“No one is free, even the birds are
chained to the sky”—resembles 19th century
literature, literature of Emerson, Whitman, and Dickens.
Dylanologists like Christopher Ricks,
former professor of English at Cambridge University has compared Dylan to the
great poets: Dylan’s “Not dark yet” has been compared to Keats’s ‘Ode to a
Nightingale’. In the words of Ricks, “For fifty years, all the world has
delighted in Bob Dylan’s books of words and more than words: provocative,
mysterious, touching, baffling, not-to-be-pinned-down, intriguing, and a
reminder that genius is free to do as it chooses. And, again and again, these
are not the words that he sings on the initially released albums.”
Billy Collins, the former United States
poet laureate, admitting that “lyrics don’t really hold up without the music”
argued that Dylan deserved to be recognized as a poet for his “lyrics are
interesting on the page even without the harmonica and the guitar and his very
distinctive voice.”
As is thus evident that Dylan is
certainly not a mere musician, the lyrics of his early 20s sounding almost
philosophical, raising weighty questions about peace, war and capturing the
spirit of the times had become anthems for the anti-war and civil rights
movements of the US of 1960s. The commercial success that Dylan enjoyed all
along is more due to his ability to connect with the angst of two generations of
the US and the world growing up under the threat of atom bomb with lyrics such as:
“Oh,
where have you been, my blue-eyed son? …
I
have been ten thousand miles in the mouth of a graveyard …
I
saw a new born baby with wild wolves all around it …
I
saw guns and sharp swords in the hands of young children
And
it’s a hard, and it’s a hard, it’s a hard, it’s a hard
And
it’s a hard rain’s a-gonna fall” (A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall).
He warned the American society about
the civil rights that were ‘blowing in the wind’ through his mind-blowing lyrics:
“How
many roads must a man walk down
Before
you call him a man? …
Yes,
‘n’ how many times must the cannonballs fly
Before
they’re forever banned? …
The
answer is blowin’ in the wind …
Yes,
and how many ears must one man have,
Before
he can hear people cry?
Yes,
and how many deaths will it take till he knows
That
too many people have died? …
The
answer is blowin’ in the wind” (Blowin’ In The Wind, 1962).
Dylan, the icon of an age of protest,
pleaded with the senators and mothers of the US to see the shifts in America
and the post-colonial world when he sang:
“Come
senators, congressmen
Please heed
the call …
There’s a
battle outside and it is ragin’
It’ll soon
shake your windows and rattle your walls
For the
times they are a-changin’ ….
Come
mothers and fathers throughout the land, and don’t criticize what you can’t
understand. Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command. Your old road
is rapidly ageing” (The Times They Are A-Changin’).
To say Dylan’s classics lessening the
language barrier by the force of their immediacy that indeed is universal and
timeless, unite strangers even, one simply need to listen to this one piece
that taunts every traveller on the planet:
“You never
turned around to see the frowns on the jugglers and the clowns …
After he
took from you everything he could steal
How does it
feel …
To be on
your own
With no
direction home
A complete
unknown
Like a
rolling stone?” (Like A Rolling Stone).
This
song of four verses and a chorus was perceived by his close followers as Dylan’s ‘vomit’ directed at an unknown antagonist written
after his return from a tour of England in 1965, and when the disc was finally released,
its opening snare shot was felt as if it “kicked open the door to your
mind.” The lyrics delivered in Dylan’s sardonic tone in a tumbling, cascading
style hypnotized the listeners, including Paul McCartney, who felt: “It seemed to go on and on forever.
It was just beautiful.”
Now, returning to Bob… it must be said
that interestingly, with every passing decade, Dylan, as some of the critics
observed, experimenting with the intersection of the literary and musical
world, reinvented himself to constantly fathom the depths of darkness and
deliver hope to his listeners. In 1975, Dylan released the album, ‘Blood on the
tracks’, the lyrics of which testifies the trump of the troubadour:
“Little red
bike
I ain’t no
monkey but I know what I like.
I like the
way you love me strong and slow,
I’m taking
you with me, honey baby,
When I go.”
At 60, Dylan released the album, ‘Love
and Theft’ in 2001 that is abound with cracked and ruined love affairs. In
‘Mississippi’, the ravaged love travelogue, Dylan sings,
“Your days
are numbered, so are mine …
I need
something strong to distract my mind
I’m gonna
look at you ‘til my eyes go blind …
I know that
fortune is waiting to be kind
So give me
your hand and say you’ll be mine …”
but none of these heartaches can find
solace. In the last song of the album Dylan, standing with his back to the sun,
“cause the light is too intense” sings to a woman pleading her to open her eyes
to his love:
“Love
is pleasing, love is teasing, love not an evil thing …
You
went years without me, might as well keep goin’ now…”
In all, the lyrics sounding just like
running commentary about the relations of man and woman, make the past strange,
haunted and alluring as the future.
Dylan, fusing the worlds of music and
literature together with his unique voice and unforgettable lyrics—lyrics that
are sure to free us for brief moments from this prosaic world, indeed some of
them made many of us “feel physically as if the top of my [our] head[s] were
taken off”—has kept himself relevant to the listeners for more than five
decades. Irrespective of the definitions of poetry, as the Academy observed, he
acquired “the status of an icon. His influence on contemporary music is
profound, and he is the object of a steady stream of secondary literature.”
Way back in 1963, watching the solo
performance of the then 21-year-old Dylan, a reviewer of New York Times
observed: “Dylan’s words and melodies sparkle with the light of an inspired
poet.” And 53 years later Nobel Jury, dramatically redefining the boundaries of
literature—“Bob Dylan writes poetry for the ear”, has confirmed it. So to
conclude, without comparing and contrasting ‘music’ and ‘literature’, and
ignoring the purists and their angst about high and low art, “I‘ll just say
fare thee [Bob Dylan] well”.
Portarit - By Sri Sattiraju Shankaranarayana garu
No comments:
Post a Comment