As
August inched towards its end, rupee, opening at 70.69 as against the previous
day’s record closing rate of 70.59, fell by 0.21%, and what was more disturbing
was: going forward the trend appears to be weak. And the reasons for such a steep fall are not
far off: the heavy month-end demand for dollars from importers, particularly
from oil-importers and foreign capital outflows from the capital market,
plunged rupee to an all-time low. It all started with the political turmoil in
Turkey which impacted its lira vis-à-vis dollar and the contagion spreading to
all other emerging market currencies. But it is the rupee that has become the
worst performing currency in Asia, depreciating almost by 9% since January. It
is our widening current account deficit, which is around 2.5% of GDP for FY 19
that caused continuous shortage of dollar liquidity which is primarily
responsible for this fall.
Of
course, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been intervening in the currency
market to slowdown the fall of rupee, and in the process, its reserves have
indeed come down from an all-time high of $426.88 bn in April 2018 to $400.8 bn
for the week ended 17 August. Yet, some dealers opine that its intervention is
not matching the kind of rising demand for dollars that the market is
witnessing.
As
the RBI pointed out, in the days to come, rupee is likely to be impacted by
global risk factors such as: one, geopolitical developments in West Asia
leading to sharp hike in crude oil prices; two, faster-than-anticipated pace of
rate hike by the US Fed; and three, trade-related tensions across the major
trading partners such as the US, Eurozone, China, etc., and the resulting
volatility in the financial markets.
That
aside, even domestic factors such as the growing cost of the rising import of
crude oil owing to rising global prices, lowering of goods and services (GST)
rates on a range of consumer goods, the tax cut on small businesses and the
relatively high minimum support prices declared by the government for
agricultural produce are equally causing concern, for cumulatively they are
certain to adversely impact the fiscal position. And, increased fiscal deficit
is likely to fuel the inflation further, which in turn will have its own impact
on exchange rates.
Here
it is in order to recall what Raghuram Rajan, Professor from Chicago
University, said at this year’s Jackson Hole get-together of Central bankers.
He said that risk is building up again in the system and the trade-wars
initiated by the US are potential enough to trigger the vulnerability in the
system into a crisis. And, the prevailing global and domestic risk factors that
India is facing are likely to expose us to such vulnerabilities.
As
commonsense would dictate, it is the importers who are very displeased with the
falling rupee, for it straightaway affects their profitability. But
surprisingly, this time round, even exporters are vociferously airing their
concern against the depreciating rupee. They lament that in the wake of
continuously falling rupee, they are finding it extremely difficult to
negotiate a right price with their importers. However, at the same time, citing
REER, they also argue that any depreciation of rupee is a move in the right
direction, for it makes rupee more competitive among the trading partners. And
this, they argue, shall in turn give boost to our exports. But this appears to
be a myth, for our exports have indeed grown when the REER has grown. That aside,
what exporters need to bear in mind is the impact of domestic inflation likely
to be caused by depreciating rupee on the costs of their exports.
Now,
this raises an obvious question: Should the policy makers let the rupee spiral
down in this manner? There is no ‘the’ answer, but the prevailing global
factors warn us not to fall into the trap of exporters’ arguments. Even
otherwise, the REER announced by BIS Board places rupee at 100.39, which means
there is no overvaluation of rupee, while the REER of RBI calculated with
2004-05 as the base year against the currencies of China, Hong Kong, the US,
Eurozone, Japan and UK currently stood at 123—meaning rupee is overvalued by
23% in relation to these economies. This difference in the estimates of BIS and
our RBI demands a fresh debate on the very style of calculation of REER by the
RBI.
That
being the reality, the way forward is: improving our macroeconomic fundamentals
and diversifying our exports. This obviously calls for requisite structural
reforms on the lines that the RBI has recently asked for. Introducing
short-term measures such as allowing manufacturing firms to avail external
commercial borrowing of up to $50 million for one year maturities in place of
the existing three-years is certainly a bad idea. For, such measures can only
help us tide over the immediate crisis but are sure to create more stress in
the future as the short term external debt is already hovering around 42
percent of the total foreign currency loans. Yes, imposing import curbs on
non-essential goods is likely to ease to current account deficit. Similarly,
government not yielding to the demand for cutting duties on petrol and diesel
is in the right direction, for it can reduce demand (?) and certainly pave the
way for environmental improvement. And revisiting some of the measures that RBI
took in 2013—opening a special swap-window for oil importers and even inviting FCNR
deposits with attractive interest rates—is no bad idea at this juncture.
So,
in the ultimate analysis, the focus of the policy makers should be on long-term
reforms that can improve our current account deficit. And that is what the
policy makers should address fast if we wished to stop depreciation of rupee on
a long-term basis.
No comments:
Post a Comment