Much against this norm, on
January 19 , Ms Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand’s Prime Minister bravely announced
her resignation stating , “I am leaving because with such a privileged role,
comes responsibility to know when you are the right person to lead and also
when you are not… I know what this job takes and I know that I no longer have
enough in the tank to do justice. It is that simple.”
Holding back her tears, Ms Ardern—the
world’s youngest female head of a government when she became Prime minister in
2017 at the age of 37—said that February 7 will be her last working day in
Prime Minister’s office. She even declared that she would not seek re-election
when New Zealand goes to the polls on October 14. That is something unheard of
in the world of realpolitik. Yet, there are, of course, the usual journalistic
speculations aplenty about the real reason behind her resignation.
Maybe, anticipating such speculations, she even said: “I know there will be much discussion in the aftermath of this decision as to what the so-called real reason was”. She went on saying, “The only interesting angle you will find is that after going on six years of some big challenges, that I am human. Politicians are human. We give all that we can, for as long as we can, and then it’s time. And for me, it’s time. I’m not leaving because I believe we can’t win the election, but because I believe we can and will, and we need a fresh set of shoulders for that challenge.”
Her announcement simply stunned
the world. For, seldom such a decision, that too, from a pretty young
politician who proved to be a successful leader, ever heard of. The Australian
Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, paid his tribute to Ms Ardern saying, she “has
shown the world how to lead with intellect and strength…She has demonstrated
that empathy and insight are powerful leadership qualities.”
True, Ardern was to navigate New
Zealand through unprecedented times. Her response to the deadly Christchurch shootings
at two mosques by a lone gunman that killed 51 people—“You may have chosen us,
but we utterly reject and condemn you”—has shown a model-antidote to the right-wing
populism: she went to the grieving families wearing a hijab to mourn with them.
Following the attack she banned military-style semi-automatic firearms just
within six days of the incident, besides passing a new law to curb hate speech.
Her calm and measured reaction
to the volcanic explosive eruption in Whakaari/White Island in December 2019 which
claimed 21 lives was equally praised by the world leaders. Indeed, the photos of
her hugging the first responders to comfort them became iconic. Obviously, her
praise for them—“They have done an incredible job under devastating circumstances”
—sounded pretty true to everyone.
Similarly, her handling the Covid-19
pandemic was proved to be exemplary. She closed the boundaries before a single
case was detected and also made observation of quarantine requirements very stringent.
As a result, the Covid19-related death rates in New Zealand turned out to be
one of the lowest in the developed world. She handled the crisis with
sensitivity, empathy and concern: she freely chatted with people on Facebook and
shared reliable information and extended reassurance to all those who remained
under forced isolation. This made her a darling of the citizens.
She had many firsts to her
credit—she was the first leader to bring her baby to the United Nations General
assembly meeting just a few months after Neve was born. Addressing the UNO, she
made a pragmatic appeal to the members: “If we want the Council to fulfill its
purpose of maintaining international peace and security, its practices need to
be updated so it is not hamstrung by the use of the veto”. Exhorting the
members “to step back from the chaos and ask what we want”, she assured them
that the simple concept of “kindness” can guarantee them “peace, prosperity and
fairness” to all.
It is this emphasis of her on “politics
of kindness” and moral vision rather than political opportunism with a pronounced
feminism that made her leadership a phenomenon called “Jacindamania”.
Now, announcing
her resignation, she has simply proved to the world that even pols can do the right
things at the right time! That aside, her talking about burnout, gave hope to
those silent sufferers to talk about burnout at work without fear of the stigma
whatsoever. Some psychologists even hope that such open discussion might even
help employers to establish support mechanisms in the organizations to help
employees successfully overcome burnout at work.
Burnout
is defined as physical and emotional exhaustion, accompanied by decreased
motivation and lowered performance at work. According to APA, burnout “results
from performing at a high level until stress and tension, especially from
extreme and prolonged physical or mental exertion or an overburdening workload,
take their toll”.
Here
it is essential to bear in mind that burnout is not a gendered condition. It
can affect anyone. Yet, instead of addressing the problem squarely, business
managers/leaders have widely stigmatized
As against
this reality, unfortunately, reacting to Jacinda’s remarks, misogynists are airing
doubts about women’s ability to stand up to the demands of a high-profile
leadership role. This is purely unscientific, for it is simply an “occupational
phenomenon”.
Indeed,
the bold assertion of Jacinda should help people to freely talk about the
impact of burnout and come to terms with the fact that leaders are never meant
to be “invincible, and emotionless”. Let us fondly hope that her bold
leadership traits would become contagious …
Hope politicians around the world would take a leaf out of her exemplary moral and courage to quit the glory of being on the top and desist the urge to be on the top of the world for ever
ReplyDeleteThanks Dr Ramachandra... If a leader remembers what Seneca wrote in his letters to Lucilius, “Let us prepare our lives as if we’d come to the very end of life… Let us balance life’s book each day”, he/she can, as you have hoped for, certainly “put the finishing touches on their [his/her] life each day…”
ReplyDelete